Amber Heard seeks mistrial, says the unsuitable juror was seated in Johnny Depp defamation trial
News

Amber Heard seeks mistrial, says the unsuitable juror was seated in Johnny Depp defamation trial

Johnny Depp’s multi-million win towards Amber Heard is as soon as once more being challenged after Heard’s authorized group filed paperwork Friday in search of a mistrial, stating that the unsuitable juror was seated for the prolonged defamation trial.

The five-page doc filed in a Fairfax County, Virginia circuit courtroom says that Juror No. 15 “was not the person summoned for jury responsibility on April 11, 2022.”

Heard’s attorneys wrote that the right juror was 77 years outdated on the time of the trial and Juror No. 15 was 52. The courtroom paperwork declare that each folks share the identical final identify and handle.

“Because the Courtroom little question agrees, it’s deeply troubling for a person not summoned for jury responsibility nonetheless to look for jury responsibility and serve on a jury, particularly in a case corresponding to this,” the paperwork state.

Heard’s authorized group argued that her “due course of was due to this fact compromised” and “a mistrial needs to be declared, and a brand new trial ordered.”

The six-week televised trial ended final month when a jury awarded Depp $10.4 million in damages. The “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor sued his ex-wife over a 2018 opinion-editorial essay by Heard in The Washington Submit, during which she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse.” Depp’s attorneys argued that he was defamed by the essay despite the fact that it didn’t point out him by identify.

The jury additionally awarded Heard $2 million in her counterclaim towards Depp after concluding that Heard was defamed by one among Depp’s attorneys, who accused her of making an in depth hoax that included roughing up the couple’s residence to look worse for police.

Heard’s authorized group beforehand introduced up the juror concern in post-trial motions, saying {that a} juror was not correctly vetted. In addition they requested the courtroom to toss out the decision, arguing that it was not supported by the proof.

Within the post-trial motions, attorneys for Heard argued that to search out she had precise malice when she wrote the essay, Depp would have needed to present that she didn’t consider she had been abused.

“As an alternative, the proof overwhelmingly supported Ms. Heard believed she was the sufferer of abuse by the hands of Mr. Depp,” Heard’s attorneys mentioned of their movement.

Attorneys for Depp couldn’t instantly be reached for touch upon the most recent courtroom submitting. Heard’s authorized group declined to remark.